The controversy over Steve Marriette’s new AI. Generated album. The late Steve Marriott, legendary frontman of the Small Faces and Humble Pie, is at the center of a heated debate over the potential use of artificial intelligence to produce music featuring his voice his third wife, Tony Marriott, controls his estate and has considered using AI to complete unfinished tracks. But Marriott’s children and a cohort of rock’s most respected figures have voiced staunch opposition, fearing that AI manipulation could tarnish his authentic and revered musical legacy. Heck, in a morning, that’s Michelle when you time afraid.
Things, right? Touch your door, just tell you with the light. Wanna bring you down a stride. They have the things that we like. Happy. Make your dream of me at night. For your.
Life. I understand. For your life. Marriet’s daughter, Molly Marriott, has been vocal about her disapproval. She expressed her distress saying the Marriott estate is due to release an AI. Solo album of old and new songs of my father, Steve. Sadly, the surviving family had nothing to do with the estate as there was no will. It is run by my stepmother, who was only married to my father for two years and has since remarried. Molly’s condemnation doesn’t stop at familial exclusion. She fears the project would be a stain on my father’s name and emphasize that the use of AI for such purposes is only for money, not art nor appreciation. The opposition isn’t just familial.
Music legends, including Robert Plant and Peter Frampton, along with other notable figures such as David Gilmore and Paul Weller, have supported Marriette’s children. Robert Plant eloquently captured the collective sentiment, stating, this is a far cry from what any of us dreamt of when we set off into this wonderful world of music. We just can’t stand by and watch this unfold.
Despite the outcry, the management of Marriott’s estate remains unmoved. Chris France, managing director of Marriette’s estate since 1997, stated, at present, there are no confirmed plans to use Steve Marriet’s voice on AI recordings, but also noted that this does not preclude future agreements. This situation underscores a broader ethical dilemma facing the music industry today, the posthumous use of an artist’s work and likeness. It begs the question of where the line should be drawn between preserving an artist’s legacy and exploring new technological frontiers. Should the voice of a deceased artist be used to create new works they had no hand in creating? Is consent from family enough, or should there be broader consensus among those who knew the artist best? As the debate rages on, the music industry watches closely. The outcome could set significant precedence for how estates handle the legacies of deceased artists in the age of emerging technologies like AI. No, and.
I think of you each step of my way.
Will always love you.
Hello. The controversy over Steve Marriott’s AI. Album is not just about a single album or artist, but about the future of artistic legacy in an increasingly digital world. As Molly Marriott poignantly puts it, this situation represents a sad world to behold, signaling a potential shift in how we value artistic authenticity and legacy. Wow. Hey, I made, you know, hey.