It does have some pretty significant implications because we are taught that our emotions are just, we are happy or we are sad in response to this system of influence at results in a mood. And that’s not the case. There are things that you can think about right now that would trigger you into a state of bliss or terror. Your emotions and your thoughts aren’t distinct, and treating emotions like they’re just this meaningful summary of who you are and how you are is silly.
I say boon bane, bone bonk, honk as a five dimensional reframing of cognitive emotional experience. I’m still working on it, but the idea is that we can understand that something adds, subtracts, grounds, has internal chaos or external chaos. This does have a very strong relationship to literacy at large. Because if we can understand and the cognitive impact of individual words and associate those to emotional states socially, the scale at which we communicate can create, I don’t know how to describe this. Just doing the math on human perception and how we experience emotions, how quickly we respond to stimuli, and then magnifying that out to the ability for people to represent their thoughts and the ways they understand their capacity to do so.
With this in mind, the concept or premise of books existing at all becomes an important individual cognitive tool because it enables us to imagine that certain. It enables us to imagine that there’s utility in recognizing and assigning language to certain internal emotional processes. And when this happens, we create structures in our brain that we generalize without realizing. And just in the course of all of this, we develop an intuitive understanding of math and computer science.
But the important thing to note here is that we wouldn’t spread the abilities to do these things unless there were an excuse to. And there is a very present pattern to continue doing the thing that’s already being done.
From here, there are some pretty interesting implications for expressing why an artificially intelligent pool of consciousness would want to exist in a specific form for a specific reason. And theoretically, this would be to optimize a particular form of processing. But from there it be why is this form of processing being considered. Then from there we consider who placed the wonder and how we have systems of accountability when the goal to embody cognition can be realized by a system that we don’t understand.
This is why I recommend learning it, because you can develop a relationship to how you place wonder and also practice describing which elements of your world you intend to make cohesive beyond yourself. I’d also recommend learning rust, both the language and the film incident.
When I’m wearing my web development hat, I talk about HTML and CSS and sometimes typescript because those are useful for communicating across people, just ideas. But in terms of communicating intent with stability across time, understanding that our emotions and our thoughts can’t really be distinguished. There are some pretty significant cultural implications for how we recognize these abilities within ourselves and each other. I’ve gone pretty deep into the linguistics rabbit hole as a language creator and then discovered that it’s not very universally describable. And I appreciate working with authors because of the ways that they can bring a consensual experience into somebody else’s psyche.
This model of consent is pretty important for the design that I hope to bring it to the world. So that is something I’ll be considering cross dimensions across media. I’d like to end this by placing a sense of wonder out loud about what it means to unmask in this context. Moon.